Here are the considerations:
- No marginal cost to add new customers (extremely elevated margins)
- Old customers experience lock-in as they build systems around the SAAS offering
- The software is not pirate-able because it is offered as a service
- High customer satisfaction because software patches, upgrades, and fixes can be rolled out anytime
- Modular with the ability to sell collateral offerings based on the core service offering
- Some degree of pricing power because of the value of the offering to customer
But how do we put some kind of back-of-the-envelope number on the value of a company like Snowflake (SNOW)?
Here's one way, using the traditional metric of the P/E ratio, which is used to value traditional companies.
Snowflake currently generates $500 million in revenue, the growth predictions, (very roughly) are as follows
- 2020: $500 million
- 2021: $1 billion
- 2022: $2 billion
- 2023: $4 billion
- 2024: $8 billion
- 2025: $16 billion
Suppose now that in 2025, Snowflake stopped growing, or started growing substantially more slowly, but instead started to take profits and managed to take a 50% profit on its revenues, of $8 billion/year. A P/E ratio of 20 would give Snowflake a market-capitalization of $160 billion, a gain of 2.3x its current market capitalization or 166% in only 5 years. That's a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 33.3% over 5 years!
And this is a conservative valuation based on the idea that Snowflake, rather than continuing to invest in GROWTH decides to just start taking profits.
Thus, holding onto a company even when its valuation fluctuates wildly in the short term is very worthwhile as long as the growth story stays stable. These are GREAT companies.